HardInfo Bug Tracker Syndication Feed

segfault on FFT benchmark on Intel Atom N270

2012-01-20T02:06:21Z

Bug ID:	61
Summary:	segfault on FFT benchmark on Intel Atom N270
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Moderate

When I click on FFT benchmark I get a segfault.

gdb output:

(gdb) r
Starting program: /usr/bin/hardinfo
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb5c1cb40 (LWP 2910)]
[New Thread 0xb541bb40 (LWP 2911)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb5c1cb40 (LWP 2910)]
0xb6d4264a in lup_solve (a=0x829b950, perm=0x0, b=0x87adaf0) at fftbench.c:134
134 y[i] = b[perm[i]] - sum;
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb6d4264a in lup_solve (a=0x829b950, perm=0x0, b=0x87adaf0)
at fftbench.c:134
#1 0xb6d42842 in fft_bench_start () at fftbench.c:186
#2 0xb6d3e41a in fft_for (start=0, end=1, data=0x0, timer=0xb7faed07)
at ./arch/common/fft.h:26
#3 0xb6d3da44 in benchmark_parallel_for_dispatcher (data=0x82c5560)
at benchmark.c:78
#4 0xb762e344 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#5 0xb7fabd4c in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#6 0xb731703e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
Backtrace stopped: Not enough registers or memory available to unwind further

cdrom player doesn´t respond

2012-01-16T22:04:13Z

Bug ID:	60
Summary:	cdrom player doesn´t respond
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Moderate

computer COMPAQ Evo pentium 4 After installing Ubuntu the cd-rom player doesn´t respond.
It´s regonized in the bios and Ican see it in the hardware list.

Add a list of groups on the system

2012-01-08T13:36:21Z

Bug ID:	54
Summary:	Add a list of groups on the system
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Enhancement

Forwarded from Ubuntu : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/734948

Hardinfo provides informations about the users of the system. It would be nice to have the same ability, but for groups on the system, as a list, like users.

Does not recognize LXDE or Lubuntu (patch exists)

2012-01-08T13:24:39Z

Bug ID:	55
Summary:	Does not recognize LXDE or Lubuntu (patch exists)
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Enhancement

In Computer => Operating System => Desktop Environment, LXDE and Lubuntu are not recognized. The entry field shows "Unknown (Window manager: Openbox).

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/778148 for the bug as filed against the hardinfo Ubuntu package.

A simple patch that corrects this issue is available at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/778148/+attachment/2124152/+files/hardinfo_0.5.1-1.1ubuntu4.improved.debdiff

Mainboard info

2012-01-08T13:16:36Z

Bug ID:	31
Summary:	Mainboard info
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/Current development version
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Enhancement

I've noticed hardinfo is missing mainboard information.
It would be very nice if it was available too.

Battery information triggers error message on standard error

2011-12-30T21:38:38Z

Bug ID:	59
Summary:	Battery information triggers error message on standard error
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Trivial

I noticed that whenever start hardinfo from an xterm and click on the "battery" entry in hardinfo, I got the error message

sh: -c: option requires an argument

in the terminal where I started hardinfo. I took a little look in the code and believe this comes from the function __scan_battery_apcupsd(void) in arch/linux/x86_64/battery.h (and most or all other arch/linux/*/battery.h). It contains this code

apcaccess_path = find_program("apcaccess");

if ((apcaccess = popen(apcaccess_path, "r"))) {

If the system doesn't have apcaccess installed, find_program() will return NULL. But the popen() regardless, and when apcaccess_path is null, it will cause the error message. I would suggest you add a "if (apcaccess_path == NULL) return" in between the above lines. Or some similar change with the same effect.

Sort Does not Work

2011-12-03T02:41:18Z

Bug ID:	58
Summary:	Sort Does not Work
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Confirmed
Severity:	Enhancement

Selecting column headings to sort data (in benchmarks) does not work. It would be a good feature.

Thanks!

In "Release" or "RelWithDebInfo" modes, not all cpu test results are reported

2011-11-15T14:46:21Z

Bug ID:	57
Summary:	In "Release" or "RelWithDebInfo" modes, not all cpu test results are reported
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/Current development version
Status:	Unconfirmed
Severity:	Major

If the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is set to RelWithDebInfo or Release, the cpu statistics 'This Machine' are not reported.

Running the debug version outputs the results.

Removing optimisation from the release version (-O3, -O2, etc.) does not correct this.

The only the CPU Fibonacci test reports results.

Running latest development version (f28dbb3158054925808f4bdadd608794a44eb692) on Debian Squeeze, Atom processor

$ hardinfo --version:
HardInfo version 0.5.2pre
Copyright (C) 2003-2009 Leandro A. F. Pereira. See COPYING for details.

Compile-time options:
Release version: Yes (ARCH_x86)
BinReloc enabled: Yes
Data prefix: /usr/local/share/hardinfo
Library prefix: /usr/local/lib/hardinfo
Compiled on: linux-ARCH_x86 2.6.32-5-686 ()
Modules:
File Name Name Version
libcomputer.so Computer 0.5.2pre
libdevices.so Devices 0.5.2pre
libnetwork.so Network 0.5.2pre
libbenchmark.so Benchmarks 0.5.2pre

'E:Type 'n' is not known on line 1 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-wine-ppa-natty.list

2011-09-28T09:46:49Z

Bug ID:	56
Summary:	'E:Type 'n' is not known on line 1 in source list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-wine-ppa-natty.list
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/Current development version
Status:	Closed
Severity:	Major

will not let me open update manager

CPU benchmarks aren't performed correctly and give wrong results (cpufreq ignored)

2011-07-08T12:28:29Z

Bug ID:	48
Summary:	CPU benchmarks aren't performed correctly and give wrong results (cpufreq ignored)
Product/Component/Version:	HardInfo/0.5.1
Status:	Unconfirmed
Severity:	Moderate

The CPU benchmarks aren't performed correctly and give wrong results.

I've got an AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000 and use cpufrequtils to set the CPU frequency on demand. So the CPU cores are usually running at 1000 MHz and only if needed at the maximum of 3000 MHz which is working pretty well. When performing the HardInfo benchmarks the CPU is only tested at 1000 MHz instead of its full speed of 3000 MHz. So the results of the CPU benchmarks are far too low and don't reflect the full performance of the CPU.